I have been
trying for the sake of my own physical and mental health from commenting on
anything related to religion lately. My good. But this I think is more a grown man’s
attraction for another man and closeted (suppressed) in the name of
superstition and or religion (RC religion to be exact). Not quite legitimate religion I think.
While
traveling down low so to speak to try and find how tortured souls, closeted
homophobes like Bill Donohue at the Catholic League Mimeograph machine website
might be commenting (not thinking) on the recent headlines of kind words for
gays from the pope and his crew or tortured souls, closeted homophobe bishops I
ran into Bill’s disgust at an actor Tom Selleck.
In another
article BTW at the CL site is an article about how “Confused” both the Pope and
the Media are about leaked unfinished kind words for “gays” at the current “Synod of
Bishops” in Rome…
Well I confess
to a certain prejudice. I stopped watching anything the actor Tom Selleck was
in long ago once I found out he was a big contributor and card carrying member
of the GOP. Mediocre actors need mediocre audiences?
I had to
look up what Blue Bloods is as a TV show. See commercials. But don’t want to
have to waste any of the precious time I have left on earth in watching a grade
“B” Hollywood actor actor like Selleck on a TV Cop Soap Opera show. The grade “B”
Hollywood actor Ronald Reagan comes to mind when I think of Selleck and guess
what.
That is the name of the fictional character that Bill Donohue has been
getting off on in the past five seasons of “Blue Bloods” of a family of Irish
Catholic Cops doing their stuff in New York City with get this, overseen by
dad, Commissioner “Frank Reagan” (Tom Selleck) – a load of pre-cum on that
fictional name and load of brute power as chief of Police. AHH! Release! (Oh
Bill).
Well anyway,
Chief Frank Reagan says something nice about da “gays” on his TV show and Bill
Donohue wants CBS to cancel the show. Great wet dream if you can pull it off
Bill. Have a nice bigoted life.
Masturbation
Foreplay (in words):
We’ve (the royal we? Bill and little Willy?) been impressed with the underlying positive message
of “Blue Bloods” over the years, as well as its welcome treatment of
Catholicism. But after last Friday’s show, we’re now wondering whether CBS is
turning on its audience. We’ve been bombarded with complaints following the
last episode.
Police Commissioner Reagan cannot defend the Church’s
teachings on homosexuality, so when Catholicism is branded an “anti-gay faith,”
he replies, “Well, I do believe the Church is a little behind the times on
this.” Indeed, he goes so far as to say, “I do believe the Church is backwards
on this. And of all the stands to hold onto. In the midst of the scandals of
the past decade.” Viewers also meet a conflicted Cardinal Brennan, and a proud
lesbian, Sister Mary.
The Bible is “anti-gay.” That is the logical conclusion
that unfolds in this episode. The show also misrepresents the sexual abuse
scandal: almost all the molesting priests were practicing homosexuals.
Moreover, the scandal ended in the mid-1980s, thus showing how far behind the
times the show’s writers are. As for the wavering cardinal and the wayward
nun—it is what we would expect from writers who have decided to pivot….
.
No comments:
Post a Comment