 |
| Saint Vincent De Paul Church Houston Texas (Google Map Image) |
I see from a source that Eleanor Darragh married Alan Wilson in Harris County (Houston) Texas in 1958. Officiating minister a Msgr J D Connolly of Saint Vincent De Paul's Church there.
Also Date of Divorce from the Grifter Preacher from Carrollton Tx in 1997, Harris County records.
Still looking for date of divorce with Wilson and marriage date w/ "Rev." Rafael Cruz. This all to make certain that Senator Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz was born on the up and up, legitimately in Canada, and not out of wedlock, which would negate his claim to U.S. Citizenship according to the laws on the books of the United States in 1970, when he supposedly was born.
.
Being born out of wedlock would have made no difference in regard to Senator Cruz's US citizenship. It might be a good idea to actually read the laws instead of half-baked misinformation about them.
ReplyDeleteThe law reads as follows:
ReplyDeleteBirth Abroad Out-of-Wedlock to a U.S. Citizen Mother:
A person born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship under Section 309(c) of the INA if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and if the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth. The U.S. citizen mother must be the genetic or the gestational mother and the legal parent of the child under local law at the time and place of the child’s birth to transmit U.S. citizenship.
Either way, he acquired US citizenship via statute, which means he's not natural born citizen, gov can't grant that.
ReplyDeleteEither way, he acquired US citizenship via statute, which means he's not natural born citizen, gov can't grant that.
ReplyDeleteJesse T Mims "Here are the facts...
ReplyDelete1. Ted Cruz was automatically made a US citizen the moment he was born in Canada to an American citizen mother via US naturalization law. I don't have a link to that law; but, it has been posted several times by Ron Monks and others on the TCINANBC group page. However, the facts of the Bellei case (see below) suffice here.
2. Being a naturalized US citizen, Cruz cannot also be a natural born citizen. Therefore, he is not Constitutionally eligible to be president. However, he IS Constitutionally eligible to be a US Senator.
3. Canadian law does in fact state that Canada does not recognize dual citizenship; however, there is nothing inherent in the definition of the word recognize that denotes that a thing not recognized is banned or prohibited in any way. Therefore, the claims of some that Canadian law DID ban dual citizenship are 100% false.
4. Having been born a US citizen, it is not possible for Cruz to have entered the USA illegally when his US citizen mother brought him here at age four.
5. There are absolutely no Cruz records yet to be released that would change the above facts. Some people are even demanding that Cruz "release" things that do not exist. One example is "naturalization documents." There are none because no paperwork was required for a child born to an American citizen in a foreign country to become a naturalized US citizen. Neither a CBRA nor any other kind of "registration" CREATES US citizenship. Such documentation merely serves as proof, when and if needed, that one IS a US citizen. Such documentation is not even required, despite claims to the contrary.
Read the information at the last link you sent above about the Bellei case. Bellei's circumstance of birth was exactly as that of Cruz. Note that it says...
"Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an individual who received an automatic congressional grant of citizenship at birth, but who was born outside the United States, may lose his citizenship for failure to fulfill any reasonable residence requirements which the United States Congress may impose as a condition subsequent to that citizenship."
Note in particular that it says such a person receives "an automatic congressional grant of citizenship at birth." Therefore, no paperwork is needed in order to MAKE Cruz a US citizen The LAW automatically does that. Note further that like Bellei, Cruz automatically received US citizenship at birth.
Sadly for Bellei, the court ruled that although he too was automatically made a US citizen at birth, he was not a US citizen at the time he filed his lawsuit for the reason that he had failed to meet the residency requirements. However, unlike Bellei, since Cruz's US citizen mother brought him into the US at age four and he continued living in America, he did in fact fulfill the residency requirements. So, he was then and still is a US citizen.
The importance of Bellei is that the court ruled someone with his circumstance of birth is a naturalized citizen; and, since Cruz's circumstance of birth is the same as Bellei's, Cruz is also a naturalized citizen. Since a naturalized citizen cannot also be a natural born citizen, Cruz cannot be eligible to be president.
ALSO note that contrary to the claim that "becoming a US citizen under 1 parent being a US citizen didn’t begin in US til 1986 thru President Reagan’s Immigration Reform/Amnesty," in the Bellei case, the court relied on "section 1993 of the Revised Statutes of 1874, which conferred citizenship upon any child born outside the United States of only one American parent" to justify its decision that Bellei was born a naturalized US citizen."
Jesse T Mims "Here are the facts...
ReplyDelete1. Ted Cruz was automatically made a US citizen the moment he was born in Canada to an American citizen mother via US naturalization law. I don't have a link to that law; but, it has been posted several times by Ron Monks and others on the TCINANBC group page. However, the facts of the Bellei case (see below) suffice here.
2. Being a naturalized US citizen, Cruz cannot also be a natural born citizen. Therefore, he is not Constitutionally eligible to be president. However, he IS Constitutionally eligible to be a US Senator.
3. Canadian law does in fact state that Canada does not recognize dual citizenship; however, there is nothing inherent in the definition of the word recognize that denotes that a thing not recognized is banned or prohibited in any way. Therefore, the claims of some that Canadian law DID ban dual citizenship are 100% false.
4. Having been born a US citizen, it is not possible for Cruz to have entered the USA illegally when his US citizen mother brought him here at age four.
5. There are absolutely no Cruz records yet to be released that would change the above facts. Some people are even demanding that Cruz "release" things that do not exist. One example is "naturalization documents." There are none because no paperwork was required for a child born to an American citizen in a foreign country to become a naturalized US citizen. Neither a CBRA nor any other kind of "registration" CREATES US citizenship. Such documentation merely serves as proof, when and if needed, that one IS a US citizen. Such documentation is not even required, despite claims to the contrary.
Read the information at the last link you sent above about the Bellei case. Bellei's circumstance of birth was exactly as that of Cruz. Note that it says...
"Rogers v. Bellei, 401 U.S. 815 (1971), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an individual who received an automatic congressional grant of citizenship at birth, but who was born outside the United States, may lose his citizenship for failure to fulfill any reasonable residence requirements which the United States Congress may impose as a condition subsequent to that citizenship."
Note in particular that it says such a person receives "an automatic congressional grant of citizenship at birth." Therefore, no paperwork is needed in order to MAKE Cruz a US citizen The LAW automatically does that. Note further that like Bellei, Cruz automatically received US citizenship at birth.
Sadly for Bellei, the court ruled that although he too was automatically made a US citizen at birth, he was not a US citizen at the time he filed his lawsuit for the reason that he had failed to meet the residency requirements. However, unlike Bellei, since Cruz's US citizen mother brought him into the US at age four and he continued living in America, he did in fact fulfill the residency requirements. So, he was then and still is a US citizen.
The importance of Bellei is that the court ruled someone with his circumstance of birth is a naturalized citizen; and, since Cruz's circumstance of birth is the same as Bellei's, Cruz is also a naturalized citizen. Since a naturalized citizen cannot also be a natural born citizen, Cruz cannot be eligible to be president.
ALSO note that contrary to the claim that "becoming a US citizen under 1 parent being a US citizen didn’t begin in US til 1986 thru President Reagan’s Immigration Reform/Amnesty," in the Bellei case, the court relied on "section 1993 of the Revised Statutes of 1874, which conferred citizenship upon any child born outside the United States of only one American parent" to justify its decision that Bellei was born a naturalized US citizen."
In addition, there is no proof that Cruz's mother Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh Wilson is in fact Eleanor Darragh as it says on his mothers birth certificate and who Cruz claims is his mother. Cruz's grandmother's name was Cekine. Did Cruz's mother change her name to include a middle name? If so when and in what country? http://codeforeblog.com/?p=2885
ReplyDelete